Search blog.co.uk

  • Bill Gates Foundation Giving Millions to Top University In Order To Influence GMO “Debate” - It Must Be Dodgy

    Liberty Beacon reports:

    Former Microsoft CEO and mega mogul Bill Gates has long utilized his vast fortune to push genetically modified organisms (GMOs) through his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, but Gates’ efforts have been met with sharp criticism from millions of grassroots activists both home and abroad.

    The debate around GMOs has become increasingly one-sided in recent years, with activists spreading the word about the health dangers of genetically modified foods as well as the environmental risks (see here and here) of the lab-created crops via social media.

    Pro-GMO corporations have adjusted, attempting to fight back with their own PR campaigns (including this one where Monsanto offered money “mommy bloggers” to attend a presentation).

    Now, in an effort to “depolarize” the GMO debate, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is making a multi-million dollar donation to one of America’s most prominent universities.

    Continue reading

    Being a former computer professional I have little time for Bill Gates, the world's richest (but not most competent) computer amateur, the man who made ' Not fit for purpose" acceptable quality to put into the market.

    Gates is not the genius his fanboys present him as however, does anyone really believe it is just a coincidence that a computer company founded by a university drop out with no professional experience and no actual software product to offer but was the son of a CIA director*, was chosen to supply the operating system for PCs marketed by the US Government's preferred supplier of computer systems?

    (Did you know that MS - DOS was not developed by Microsoft, but Gates' company, having already been awarded the contract, was allowed to 'buy in' a complete operating system from a former rival bidder - and thus we were stuck with the abysmal MS DOS rather than a much superior system from Digital research, DR - DOS.

    And does anybody believe that an overpriced product with as fundamentally flawed design and the IBM / Intel motherboard architecture then became the de facto standard for personal computing in the face of opposition from many cheaper and far superior products (including a couple of British offerings, the Acorn / BBC and the Apricot range,) without a big leg up from a very powerful *non-commercial-organisation with unlimited funds at its disposal.

    These things are not coincidence, nor it is a coincidence that one of the many security loopholes, which has been present in all windows systems since Win 98, and compounded by the addition of further 'accidental fuck ups' is the applet that opens the postern gate through which the CIA, NSA, GCHQ, (and also the tech - savvy world and his wife) can enter your PC, change setup, run scripts and take liberties with your personal data.

    Everything Bill Gates does is crooked, he is and always has been the US Government's man. And if he is pushing GMOs you can bet it is because the US Government is rewarding him.

    As far as I am concerned Gates and all the other pointy headed science worshippers can eat all the toxic shite grown from monsanto's GM seeds he wants to. I avoid it, I suggest you do too for commercial as well as health reasons (Black Hat Biotech) and support political parties that want to get us out of the EU, because those bandits in Brussels are currently negotiating a 'free trade' (TTIP) deal with the American and Canadian governments that will mean American corporations don't have to tell us what kind of toxic shite they are putting in food.

    TTIP will mean you don't get any choice about whether you eat foods containing GM or Genetically Engineered (GE) organisms or not.

    Now science tits will tell you there is no risk with Genetically modified organisms as food and will then tell a pack of lies about "scientific consensus". Well you know how the "Scientific Method" the pointy heads are always banging on about works. No matter how meticulous a piece of scientific research is, if it does not agree with the "Scientific Consensus" (i.e. the lie that will attract the most government money in research grants) it will not be accepted as evidence.

    The whole of government is as corrupt and rotten as an infected digestive system and Bill Gates is a bacterium in the lower intestine. Trust nothing the suppurating syphilis sore says.

  • The Left's Rhetorical Technique Explained

    In the first of what might become a long if irregular series of posts with the collective title, "Left Wing Authoritarianism for beginners," your friend and mentor Little Nicky Nicky Machiavelli will expose the origins of the socialist left's propaganda technique and its apparent dependence on slogans, dogma and mantras.

    But first let's play a little game, stop me when you think you know where this originates from, the Obama Administration Public Relations Office, the Labour Party Manifesto, Saul Alinsky's 'Rules For Radicals' or the writings of Karl Marx:

    The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan. As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided, the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain the material offered. In this way the result is weakened and in the end entirely cancelled out.

    Well if you said "None of the above" you'd be right. The left's substitution of slogans for reasoned argument was recommended by none other than Adolf Hitler in his 1926 side splitter "Mein Kampf"; Chapter 6, "War Propaganda" (h/t George Chen).

    Does that explain why they want to reduce every debate to 'good guys versus bad guys' and never ever discuss the issues.

  • US Will Use Its ISIS Airstrikes in Syria as Aircover for Rebels To Hit Syrian Military Targets

    from Patrick Henningsen, 21st Century Wire

    President Obama?s much celebrated ISIS(L) ?strategy? speech came on Tuesday night amid great fanfare and even greater debate. Sure, he outlined a strategy, but the President has been harboring another hidden agenda ? one you won?t get a straight answer on.

    Obama rode a wave of public outrage and fear into Tuesday?s address, mostly due to the extensive media coverage of the alleged murders of two American journalists, James Foley and Steven Sotloff ? a drama played out on Youtube of all places. The beheadings were important in this process because they set the US military media campaign into hyper-drive. The timing in the run-up to the 9/11 anniversary seemed uncanny.

    Obama?s public agenda is the one you can see on the table, one where the US officials promise to ?degrade and destroy ISIS?. Sounds great. Who can disagree with that?

    Then there?s the hidden agenda, somewhere under the table, and not really up for rational debate. That?s probably because it?s highly illegal and has something to do with what started the ISIS crisis to begin with.

    This is how Obama plans to sneak back in and re-ignite with last year?s failed bombing campaign that never was in Syria. He explains, ?I have made it clear that we will hunt down terrorists who threaten our country, wherever they are. That means I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL in Syria.?

    Continue reading (long and detailed article)

    RELATED POSTS:

    Lawless Libya is fault of the FUKUS axis
    Intervening in Libya was a big mistake
    ISIS and the imperative of war in Iraq and Syria
    Drive for global government

  • As soon as Obama gets one new war he wants another.

    It was only two days ago Barack Hussein Obama went on tlevision to pitch his latest was to the American people. Contrary to what our ideologically idiotic leftie friends might tell you, America is not overwhelmingly in favour of Obama. Those who never supported him or feel the warmonger In Chief has betrayed them are not "a few right wing nut jobs who believe God created the world 4,000 years ago," but actually about 50% of Americans with a a further significant minority believing Obama is well intentioned but even more clueless than Jimmy Carter.

    Also contrary to what our ideologically idiotic leftie friends might tell you, Americas are not stupid even if their President is. They know a war against ISIS can never be won and cannot even succeed in checking the advance of the Islamic State forces without boots on the ground. And America has no desire for another war.

    Obama is a solipsist however, and thus is as detached from reality as Tony Blair was. Already he is working on starting another war. Or to be exact, restarting another failed war.

    Even as their heads are still reeling from the earbashing they took when Britain and Germany when they held out the begging bowl for support in a new war in Iraq and Syria, America's Dumb and Dumber team, Barack Obama and John (Herman Munster) Kerry are trying to seduce Algeria into allowing The Evil Empire to set up bases within its borders from which to attack Libya.

    Reintervention: Algeria considering US, France request to ‘facilitate’ Libya military strikes

    from stratrisks.com

    Algeria is reportedly studying requests by the US and France to “facilitate” military operations against militant groups in neighbouring Libya.

    “The US and France have both asked Algeria to open its airspace to surveillance planes and other military planes transferring commando units for a reconnaissance mission in parts of Libya,” the source, requesting anonymity, told Anadolu Agency.

    He added that the US and France have made the same request of “other states near Libya.”

    Interesting to note that although it may be nothing but a rumour, one news report today said the assessors of the Nobel Peace Prize let it be known they regretted giving the peace prize to Obama. I think that's a bit harsh, he has worked tirelessly to achieve peace ... by killing every fucker in the world.

  • Oh Barack We Hardly Knew Ye

    A brilliant blog post from Zero Hedge today, only indirectly related to the financial topics they usually comment on, it is a response to President The Emperor Obama's latest foray into Foreign Policy and probably his stupidest move yet (and thast is very very stupid indeed) as he finally achieves what he has been trying to do for the past three years and insert the USA into to intractible sectarian wars in the middle east.

    The Change You Can Believe In promised by The Obamessiah then turns out to be a change from uneasy peace to perpetual war. How very very Orwellian. Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere's Tyler:

    Barack, We Hardly Knew Ye
    Submitted by Tyler Durden

    With your drums and guns and guns and drums, hurroo, hurroo
    With your drums and guns and guns and drums, hurroo, hurroo
    With your drums and guns and guns and drums
    The enemy nearly slew ye
    Oh my darling dear, Ye look so queer
    Johnny I hardly knew ye…..

    This memorable stanza from the classic anti-war song could not be more apt with respect to Barack Obama. He became President because he campaigned across the land draped in the garlands of peace. Yet he has now promised to spend his final three years in the White House smearing his face with war paint and strutting around the imperial city marshalling his “drums and guns and guns and drums”.

    And let’s be clear. The President’s so-called “counter-terrorism” campaign—-that special kind of violent eruption which isn’t a “war”—-is not really about punishing some barbarians who have beheaded two innocent Americans and who have also recruited perhaps a dozen not so innocent Americans to join their blood-thirsty ranks. Civilized adults just do not start a war on the other side of the world on account of such thin gruel, as horrific as the actions involved might be.

    Indeed, based on his stated reasons for war—beheadings and venomous rhetoric—Obama is on the same slippery slope that Woodrow Wilson stood on when he sent two million American GIs into the senseless slaughterhouse of northern France. It was to vindicate the freedom of Americans to sail into war zones, even on armed belligerent ships, he said.

    In the cold light of history, Wilson’s misbegotten crusade in behalf of an utterly untenable principle accomplished nothing more than to prolong a war which was already over in the spring of 1917 due to the mutual exhaustion and bankruptcy of both sides; and in so doing, he spawned the Bolshevik tyranny in Russia, the punitive peace treaty of Versailles, the revanchist evil of Nazi Germany and the world wars and cold wars which followed.

    Continue reading an in depth analysis of the nightmare scenarion Obama has invoved America (and possibly the UK) in at Zero Hedge

    RELATED POSTS:
    Western Hypocrisy In Reporting News about Ukraine And Russia
    Lawless, Leaderless Libya Becoming Terror Hub
    The Editor of Business Insider, fears Europe Is Coming Unglued from His Globalist Agenda.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.