There was never any chance that Parliament would vote down the diktat of His Excellency Fuhrergeneralissimo, President for Eternity Blair. Presented with an opportunity to “do the right thing” the Conservatives showed, as we knew they would, that they are mealy mouthed, wet-arsed cowards who whimperingly yearn for another dominatrix to do their thinking for them.
They cite tactics as an excuse for their yellow bellied cowardice. What tactics? If Trident had been rejected (in modern warfare, against a nutter with a rucksack full of bleach and acetone on a rush our tube train, it would be about as much use as the proverbial chocolate teapot) Blair would have faced a vote of confidence. Which he would have won.
Had that happened Blair would truly have been a lame duck Prime Minister, his political potency castrated and his legacy in ruins he would have had to stand by and watch his party polarise as the Tories did after the fall of Thatcher.
Now that would have been tactics.
Unfortunately Boy - boobs Cameron did not have the balls. Little Nicky will be reminding you of the Conservatives unfitness for government quite frequently between now and the next election.
-
- 2007-03-15 @ 17:41:33
you didnt expect the spineless tory jellyfish to vote against trident did you? He probably isnt even aware that Trident is the name of a nuclear weapon and probably thinks it has something to do with the little mermaid. Lets face it the clyde basin is a long way from a gentrified life in londinium and definitely a million social miles away from the playing fields of Eton. Lets face it the economic cost to the political classes is negligible, they can also content themselves with the fact that if we should have to use one of those godamned awful weapons they will be safe in their ultra impermiable bunkers ( the same place they will be if there is an accident or terrorist attack on the base) while the rest of us who live too close for comfort fry quite nicely until we are mere charcoal. I dont know if we need these things - I dont claim to know of a case when we would actually use them but I do know for sure that I dont bloody want them!
-
- 2007-03-16 @ 16:59:41
So good you said it twice!
We know Scotland can use new jobs, but a bit of regeneration with the Trident billions and some sensible "trade miles" taxes would go a long way towards creating real, meaningful jobs.
But in due course (I'm not setting timetables because of the fight I'm having with my back, shoulder and hip) you will be getting an invite to wax philosophical about the decay of society at GreenteethMultiMedia, yours truly's pet project.
-
- 2007-03-15 @ 17:41:39
you didnt expect the spineless tory jellyfish to vote against trident did you? He probably isnt even aware that Trident is the name of a nuclear weapon and probably thinks it has something to do with the little mermaid. Lets face it the clyde basin is a long way from a gentrified life in londinium and definitely a million social miles away from the playing fields of Eton. Lets face it the economic cost to the political classes is negligible, they can also content themselves with the fact that if we should have to use one of those godamned awful weapons they will be safe in their ultra impermiable bunkers ( the same place they will be if there is an accident or terrorist attack on the base) while the rest of us who live too close for comfort fry quite nicely until we are mere charcoal. I dont know if we need these things - I dont claim to know of a case when we would actually use them but I do know for sure that I dont bloody want them!
-
- http://limerwiki.blog.co.uk/
- 2007-03-15 @ 20:49:47
You don't think Tony might go tranny and return as the second coming of Mad Maggie, do you? Now that would be a worthy target for a full salvo of Trident missiles!!!!!
-
- 2007-03-16 @ 16:53:22
I thought he already was the second coming of mad Maggie
-
- http://limerwiki.blog.co.uk/
- 2007-03-16 @ 17:50:59
You're probably right

Leave a comment
Hide subcomments